Abstract

Info

Title:: Clinical effect and safety of Lvis stent-assisted endovascular coil embolization in treating ruptured intracranial aneurysm

Author(s):: YE Haiquan1; HUANG Wenchao2; 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Guidong Peoples Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Wuzhou 543001, China 2. ICU, the South Branch of Chenzhou No.1 Peoples Hospital, Chenzhou 423000, China

Keywords:: Keywords: ruptured intracranial aneurysm Lvis stent endovascular coil embolization

Abstract:: Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical effect and safety of Lvis stent-assisted endovascular coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysm. Methods A total of 84 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysm were enrolled in the study and then randomly divided into group A and group B, with 42 patients in each group. Lvis stent-assisted endovascular coil embolization was used in group A, while Solitaire stent-assisted endovascular coil embolization was adopted in group B. Rankin scale (RS), Raymond scale and Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) were used to evaluate the clinical effect, and the incidence of adverse reactions and recurrence rate after treatment were also analyzed. Results The RS score in group A was lower than that in group B (0.23+0.57 vs 2.48+0.96, P<0.05). The analysis on Raymond score revealed that the incidence of grade Ⅰ aneurysm packing in group A was higher than that in group B (92.24% vs 78.57%, P<0.05) and the analysis on GOS score showed that the proportion of 5 points in group A was 92.86%, higher than 73.81% in group B (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in group A was lower than that in group B (2.38% vs 21.43%, P<0.05). There was no recurrence in group A, but the recurrence rate was 4.76% in group B (P<0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysm, Lvis stent-assisted endovascular coil embolization has satisfactory clinical effects, with certain safety.